← Back to BillCut Daily

Long-Term Care Insurance Costs Are Climbing Faster Than Most Retirees

Persona #4 ยท Vol: 0

The sticker shock is real, and it's hitting people in their late 50s and 60s right when they're trying to lock down a retirement plan.

A long-term care insurance policy that a healthy 60-year-old couple might have snagged for a few thousand dollars a year a decade ago can now run considerably more, and in some cases the coverage isn't even as generous.

Insurers badly misjudged how long policyholders would live and how much care would cost, so they've spent years raising premiums to catch up.

Add in low interest rates from the 2010s, which squeezed the investment returns that fund payouts, and you get a product that's been repriced again and again.

Many existing policyholders have faced multiple rate increases on policies they bought believing the price was fixed.

What you'd actually pay today depends on a handful of moving parts.

Your age at purchase matters most: a 55-year-old pays far less than a 65-year-old for identical coverage.

So does the daily or monthly benefit you choose, how many years it lasts, and whether it includes inflation protection.

A policy with a $6,000 monthly benefit and three years of coverage costs dramatically more than a leaner two-year plan with no inflation rider.

For a rough sense of the range, industry surveys have put annual premiums for a healthy 60-year-old couple somewhere in the low-to-mid four figures combined, depending on the design.

Wait until 65 and the same coverage can jump by 30% to 50% or more.

Women typically pay more than men because they tend to live longer and file more claims.

Couples often get a discount, and married applicants sometimes qualify for shared-care riders that stretch benefits between spouses.

The alternatives are worth weighing before you write a check.

Some employers and unions offer group long-term care policies that skip medical underwriting, though the coverage is often thinner.

Hybrid life insurance policies bundle a death benefit with a long-term care pool, letting you tap the money if you need care and leave the rest to heirs if you don't โ€” but they tie up a large lump sum.

And self-funding, essentially earmarking a chunk of savings for care, is what a lot of families end up doing whether they plan for it or not.

Before buying anything, ask three questions.

First, can the insurer raise your premium, and by how much?

Almost all can, so assume increases are possible.

Second, what triggers a payout โ€” can you collect when you need help with two of six daily activities like bathing or dressing, or is the bar higher?

Third, what's the elimination period, the waiting time before benefits start?

A 90-day wait means you cover those costs yourself.

It's also worth checking whether your state's insurance department has a rate-increase history for the company you're considering.

Some carriers have been far more aggressive than others about raising premiums on existing customers.

That track record tells you more about the deal you're actually getting than the glossy brochure ever will.

One more thing: don't let a salesperson rush you.

These are complex contracts with language that shifts meaning depending on the rider.

If the numbers feel tight, a shorter benefit period with inflation protection often beats a longer period without it, because care costs tend to rise faster than most people expect.

The uncomfortable truth is that long-term care insurance isn't a bargain anymore โ€” it's a trade-off between paying premiums now or absorbing the cost later.

For many households, the smarter move is comparing a modest policy against a dedicated savings bucket, then deciding which risk they'd rather carry.

Final Thoughts

Either way, waiting another five years rarely makes the math kinder.

Continue Reading